Innovación Sistémica
Permanent URI for this community
Browse
Browsing Innovación Sistémica by Subject "INNOVACION"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
ponencia en congreso.listelement.badge Curriculum design and innovation in field-based learning: lessons from the Doctoral Program in Leadership and Systematic Innovation in Argentina(2017) Laszlo, Alexander; Rowland, Regina; Serpiello, Nina; Luksha, Pavel; Karabeg, Dino; Castiglioni, Sara Noemí; Zambon, Rosana; Weiss, Gorazd"Designing educational innovation in a doctoral program on Leadership and Systemic Innovation is a matter of matching form with content. The challenge to create new experiences for curriculum design becomes one of experiential integrity for learners. This requires matching curriculum content with an appropriate real-world opportunity for positive change. Classical case study methods fall short as vehicles for exploring VUCA situations — those characterized as Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous. However, it is hard to find appropriate alternative methods that provide experiential learning environments for generating useful and systemically well-balanced responses to VUCA situations. This paper presents the experience of an international team of five doctoral faculty members, aided by two second year doctoral students and a social innovation expert, to design, introduce, facilitate and model a programmatic curriculum that spanned the first year (five course modules) of the ITBA (Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires) Leadership and Systemic Innovation doctoral program with 22 students. Each course module focused on a distinct aspect of systemic innovation. This required the faculty to create a cross-cutting, field-based experience that interwove the learnings from one module to the next. In addition, the focus of the field-based experience was designed so as to expose students to a “wicked problem” (a VUCA situation that could not be addressed on the basis of one disciplinary perspective or approach alone) without requiring them to fix, resolve, or otherwise provide a solution to it. Instead, students were invited to explore various aspects of the situation from an empathic and holistic evolutionary perspective. As detailed in the paper, a significant challenge to what we called “the Interweave Model” was communicating exploratory methods to the students, and distinguishing this experience from what would be expected in classical case study research. The greatest challenge for students appeared to be holding a whole-systems perspective of the entire VUCA situation across five distinctly different subjects of the curriculum while generating opportunities for design responses within each subject that could be coherently combined."ponencia en congreso.listelement.badge Innovación y capacidad de innovación: conceptos y tipologías(2019) Castiglioni, Sara Noemí"La Real Academia Española define la palabra innovar como: del latín ‘innovāre’, mudar o alterar algo, introduciendo novedades, sin embargo, no existe una unanimidad en la definición del concepto en los ámbitos de negocios y académicos. La literatura sobre innovación ha sido descripta como “fragmentada” [CITATION Kel78\p164\l1033], “contradictoria” [CITATION Kim81\p 698\l1033] y “susceptible de interpretación” [CITATION Dow76\p70\l1033]. Sumado a esto, Anderson y King describen el término innovación como “elusivo para ser definido” [CITATION And93 \p 1\l1033], con esto en mente este capítulo se propone dar luz mediante el estudio de la literatura sobre innovación y capacidad de innovación en lo que conceptos y tipologías se refiere que permitirán clasificar en la capítulos siguientes ciertas mejoras en el sistema de administración de justicia califican como innovaciones y de que tipo. Por otro lado, se describirán las principales diferencias entre innovación en el sector público y el sector privado."ponencia en congreso.listelement.badge Innovativeness of the judiciary power: a case study using the viable system model (VSM)(2019) Castiglioni, Sara Noemí"For several years, the use of technology, open data and customer focus as innovation engines has been imposed worldwide. And the Judiciary Power as a key player in the system of administration of justice of the Argentine Republic do not escape this trend. As a consequence of this, it has implemented innovative processes in order to reduce their management times, improve the user-citizen experience and bring transparency to the process. Never the less, in Argentina these innovations are rare exceptions. In this paper the case of the “Judiciary Power of Tucumán State” will be use as a leading case for its high level of innovativeness during the last ten years. The main objective of this paper is to model using Beer’s Viable System Model approach the system in which this case is embedded, discuss and determine whether the system is a viable one or not, and compare the findings with the theoretical framework associated with the “new public management”.